volker.raschek/helm-actions
1
0
Fork 0
Code Issues Pull Requests 2 Actions Packages Projects Releases Wiki Activity
131 Commits 5 Branches 0 Tags
26781c900bdb1242d5e555d5c97fd35f9a69d376
Commit Graph
4 Commits
Author SHA1 Message Date
DaanandDaanSelen 7e2aedfdc2 feat: rename any form of act runner to gitea runner or runner (#149) 
fix: https://gitea.com/gitea/helm-actions/issues/142
Reviewed-on: https://gitea.com/gitea/helm-actions/pulls/149
Reviewed-by: Nicolas <bircni@icloud.com>
Co-authored-by: Daan <dselen@nerthus.nl>
Co-committed-by: Daan <dselen@nerthus.nl>
 2026-05-20 20:08:01 +00:00
ChristopherHXandDaanSelen 8c95dcd282 refactor!: remove actions runner token provisioning (#15) 
To be discussed. In https://gitea.com/gitea/helm-actions/issues/9#issuecomment-1002191 and https://gitea.com/gitea/helm-actions/pulls/13 I described that a migration of provisioning is currently not feasible due to
- helm limitations
  - You are forced to repeat a lot of stuff for the default branch
  -  helm-actions cannot read values of the helm-gitea chart to fix this
- No agreement about making helm-gitea a optional dependency of helm-actions can be reached at the moment

# Proposal

- Create a new repository that includes both helm-gitea **and** helm-actions
- Provisioning leaves this repository as well like it did in helm-gitea
- Create that as gitea/helm-stack or whatever name
- Provisioning code and tests moves to gitea/helm-stack

We would need help with the repository creation

Reviewed-on: https://gitea.com/gitea/helm-actions/pulls/15
Reviewed-by: DaanSelen <daanselen@noreply.gitea.com>
Co-authored-by: ChristopherHX <christopherhx@noreply.gitea.com>
Co-committed-by: ChristopherHX <christopherhx@noreply.gitea.com>
 2025-08-13 21:15:21 +00:00
Christopher HombergerandLunny Xiao 5b19636034 chore(core): refactor to make all unit tests pass (#6)
changelog / changelog (push) Successful in 21s
Details
check-and-test / check-and-test (push) Successful in 1m8s
Details 
_This is the first time I ever messed with helm and is an experiment to show what prevents the tests to pass and how far it still depends on the gitea chart_
### Description of the change

- Deletes a single test that seems to depend directly on gitea
- make all tests pass
- Moves all value accesses from `actions` one level up
- Copies content of the gitea chart required by the existing test
  - Reveals all dependencies that needs to be decoupled
- Fixes readme generation
  - add package.json
  - copy dependent readme section from helm-gitea
- Removes all dependencies
- giteaRootURL is now required to be provided
  - consistency check that this value has been provided
  - added test for consistency failure
- nc command no longer uses an hardcoded dns name and is checked in tests
  - added test
- Copied yamllint from helm-gitea
  - added pnpm lock file exclusion
- Installed pnpm in the workflow
- Updated make unittest command in CI to unittest-helm
### Benefits

The existing tests are passing

### Possible drawbacks

The provision job might still not work.

### Applicable issues

- Fixes #5

### Additional information

The following usage should now deploy
```yaml
existingSecret: "somesecret"
existingSecretKey: "key"

## Specify the root URL of the Gitea instance
giteaRootURL: "http://somedomain:3000"
```
### ⚠ BREAKING

- giteaRootURL is now required to be provided
- Moves all value accesses from `actions` one level up
  - The values.yml had this change without updating tests / dev Readme

Reviewed-on: https://gitea.com/gitea/helm-actions/pulls/6
Reviewed-by: Lunny Xiao <xiaolunwen@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: justusbunsi <justusbunsi@noreply.gitea.com>
Reviewed-by: volker.raschek <markus.pesch@web.de>
Co-authored-by: Christopher Homberger <christopher.homberger@web.de>
Co-committed-by: Christopher Homberger <christopher.homberger@web.de>
 2025-03-30 23:13:31 +00:00
pat-s 42fe8c02c2 chore: add templates, unittests and workflows 2025-03-06 22:25:49 +01:00