`nodeSelector` was a top-level value although it exclusively configures the pod spec of the Gitea Deployment.
With `affinity`, `dnsConfig` and the container environment already moved into the `deployment` dict, keeping
`nodeSelector` at the root level leaves the scheduling configuration split across two places.
Moving it into the `deployment` dict continues the consolidation of Deployment-scoped values and keeps
`nodeSelector` next to the closely related `affinity` setting. The `@param` annotations are grouped with the
values they document so the generated README table stays in sync with the structure.
A deprecation check is added so that existing installations fail fast with an actionable error message. Without
it, the node selection would be dropped silently and pods could be scheduled on nodes that do not meet the
intended requirements.
BREAKING CHANGE: `nodeSelector` no longer exists. Use `deployment.nodeSelector` instead. Installations that
still set `nodeSelector` will fail unless `checkDeprecation` is set to `false`.
Co-authored-by: Copilot <copilot@github.com>
`dnsConfig` was a top-level value although it exclusively configures the pod spec of the Gitea Deployment. With
`affinity` and `env` already moved into the `deployment` dict, keeping `dnsConfig` at the root level leaves the
Deployment configuration split across two places and makes it harder to see which values end up in the rendered
pod spec.
Moving it into the `deployment` dict continues the consolidation of Deployment-scoped values and keeps the
values structure predictable for the remaining pod-level settings.
A deprecation check is added so that existing installations fail fast with an actionable error message. Without
it, a custom DNS configuration would be dropped silently, which typically surfaces much later as unexplained
name resolution failures inside the Gitea pod.
BREAKING CHANGE: `dnsConfig` no longer exists. Use `deployment.dnsConfig` instead. Installations that still set
`dnsConfig` will fail unless `checkDeprecation` is set to `false`.
Co-authored-by: Copilot <copilot@github.com>
The `deployment` dict mixes values that apply to the Deployment object itself (`annotations`, `labels`,
`affinity`, `terminationGracePeriodSeconds`) with values that apply to a single container. `deployment.env` was
the only container-scoped key, which made it unclear which container it targets once further containers get
their own configuration.
Grouping container-scoped values under `deployment.gitea` establishes a per-container namespace and leaves room
for sibling sections without another breaking rename later. The value ordering in `values.yaml` is aligned with
the chart conventions (`enabled`, `annotations`, `labels` first).
`deployment.enabled` is introduced and wired up in the template so the Deployment can be skipped entirely. This
allows the chart to be used for rendering only the surrounding resources, e.g. when the workload itself is
managed elsewhere.
A deprecation check is added so that existing installations fail fast with an actionable error message instead
of silently dropping their environment variables, which would otherwise surface as hard-to-debug runtime
misconfiguration.
Unit tests cover the disabled Deployment, the propagation of `deployment.gitea.env` into all init containers and
the Gitea container, and the deprecation checks for `affinity` and `deployment.env`.
BREAKING CHANGE: `deployment.env` no longer exists. Use `deployment.gitea.env` instead. Installations that
still set `deployment.env` will fail unless `checkDeprecation` is set to `false`.
Co-authored-by: Copilot <copilot@github.com>
Moving `affinity` into the `deployment` dict groups it with the other Deployment-specific values and prepares a
consistent structure for further migrations of pod-level settings.
A deprecation check is added so that existing installations fail fast with an actionable error message instead of
silently dropping the affinity rules, which would otherwise lead to pods being scheduled on unintended nodes.
BREAKING CHANGE: `affinity` no longer exists. Use `deployment.affinity` instead. Installations that still set
`affinity` will fail unless `checkDeprecation` is set to `false`.
Co-authored-by: Copilot <copilot@github.com>
The admin user was the last piece of credential handling that lived outside of the `secrets` section. Worse, it was the
only credential the chart rendered as a plain environment variable value into the Deployment: unless an existing Secret
was referenced, username and password ended up in the pod spec in clear text, readable by anyone who can `get` or
`describe` the Deployment.
`gitea.admin` is therefore removed and fully replaced by `secrets.admin`:
gitea.admin.username -> secrets.admin.new.username
gitea.admin.password -> secrets.admin.new.password
gitea.admin.email -> secrets.admin.new.email
gitea.admin.passwordMode -> secrets.admin.passwordMode
gitea.admin.existingSecret -> secrets.admin.existingSecret.{enabled,secretName}
The chart now always creates a dedicated `<fullname>-admin` Secret and the Deployment consumes `GITEA_ADMIN_USERNAME`,
`GITEA_ADMIN_PASSWORD` and `GITEA_ADMIN_EMAIL` via `secretKeyRef`. This removes the clear text credentials from the pod
spec and makes the chart-managed and the externally provided case behave identically, which previously diverged.
The email address moved into the Secret as well. It used to be interpolated directly into the init script, so changing
it rewrote the init Secret, and an operator handing over admin credentials could not supply it. The key names of an
externally provided Secret are configurable via `secrets.admin.existingSecret.{emailKey,passwordKey,usernameKey}`,
because chart-defined key names cannot be assumed for Secrets managed by an external system such as a secret store.
Admin handling was previously skipped implicitly when neither an existing Secret nor a username and password were set.
This implicit behaviour is replaced by the explicit `secrets.admin.enabled` flag, so disabling it no longer requires
blanking out unrelated values.
`gitea.admin.passwordMode` validation moved from `_helpers.tpl` to `_secrets.tpl` as
`gitea.secret.admin.passwordMode` to keep all Secret related helpers in one place. `deprecation.yaml` fails the render
when `gitea.admin` is still set and points to `secrets.admin`.
New test suites cover the rendered admin Secret, the `secretKeyRef` wiring, custom key names of an existing Secret and
the password mode validation. The `secret_admin.yaml` template is registered in every suite that renders the Deployment,
as helm-unittest requires templates referenced via `$.Template.BasePath` to be listed explicitly.
BREAKING CHANGE: The `gitea.admin` object has been removed and is replaced by `secrets.admin`. Rendering fails if
`gitea.admin` is still set. Secrets referenced via `secrets.admin.existingSecret` now additionally require an `email`
key next to `username` and `password`.
Co-authored-by: Copilot <copilot@github.com>
The `signing` object was the last Secret-related configuration living outside of the `secrets` section introduced in the
previous commit. Keeping it separate meant that the GPG key Secret was the only one without configurable annotations,
labels and a proper `existingSecret` reference, and users had to learn two different conventions for the same concept.
`signing` is therefore removed and fully replaced by `secrets.gpg`:
signing.enabled -> secrets.gpg.enabled
signing.gpgHome -> secrets.gpg.new.gpgHome
signing.privateKey -> secrets.gpg.new.privateKey
signing.existingSecret -> secrets.gpg.existingSecret.{enabled,secretName}
`gpgHome` is now stored as a key inside the GPG key Secret and consumed via `secretKeyRef` instead of being rendered as
a plain environment variable value. This keeps the whole GPG configuration in a single object, so an operator can hand
over one Secret that fully describes the signing setup instead of splitting it across values and Secret data. The key
names of an externally provided Secret are configurable via `secrets.gpg.existingSecret.gpgHomeKey` and
`secrets.gpg.existingSecret.privateKeyKey`, because chart-defined key names cannot be assumed for Secrets that are
managed by an external system such as an operator or a secret store.
To avoid silently ignoring a now unknown value, `deprecation.yaml` fails the render when `signing` is still set and
points to `secrets.gpg`. As with the other deprecation guards it can be bypassed via `checkDeprecation: false`.
The unit tests are migrated accordingly and the `GNUPGHOME` assertions now verify the `secretKeyRef` shape. Two new
cases cover custom `gpgHomeKey` and `privateKeyKey` values of an existing Secret.
The README gains a `To 13.0.0` upgrade section documenting this change together with the `secrets.*` block and the
Secret renames of the preceding commits.
BREAKING CHANGE: The `signing` object has been removed and is replaced by `secrets.gpg`. Rendering fails if `signing`
is still set. Secrets referenced via `secrets.gpg.existingSecret` now additionally require a `gpgHome` key next to
`privateKey`.
Co-authored-by: Copilot <copilot@github.com>
Until now the Secrets rendered by this chart were not configurable at all. Their labels were fixed
to the chart defaults, they could not carry annotations, and there was no way to hand in a Secret
that is managed outside of the chart - except for the GPG key, which had its own special case via
`signing.existingSecret`. Users who manage their secrets with an external operator (e.g. External
Secrets, Sealed Secrets) or who need annotations for tooling such as Reloader or Kyverno had no
option but to fork the chart.
A `secrets` section is introduced with one entry per Secret (config, gpg, init, inlineConfig,
metrics), each offering:
addSHASumAnnotation add a checksum annotation to the pod template (default: true)
existingSecret.enabled reference a Secret that is not managed by this chart
existingSecret.secretName name of that Secret
new.annotations annotations for the Secret created by the chart
new.labels additional labels for the Secret created by the chart
The `new` sub-key keeps the properties of a chart-managed Secret clearly separated from the
properties of a referenced one, so it is obvious which settings are ignored once `existingSecret` is
enabled. `secretName` rather than `name` mirrors the field the value ends up in, the `secretName` of
a pod volume.
The `gitea.secret.*.name` helpers resolve to the user-provided name when `existingSecret` is
enabled, which means the Deployment volumes and the ServiceMonitor credentials pick it up without
further changes. Enabling `existingSecret` without a name fails the render with a message naming the
full values path, because Helm would otherwise silently create a Secret under the referenced name and
overwrite it.
Only two of the five Secrets had a checksum annotation before, so changes to the init scripts, the
GPG key or the metrics token did not trigger a rollout. Annotations for all five are now rendered,
each gated by `addSHASumAnnotation` and skipped for Secrets the chart does not manage.
Two side effects had to be preserved when a Secret is no longer rendered:
- secret_config.yaml carries the HA assertions (RWX access mode, issue/repo indexer, mutually
exclusive PostgreSQL dependencies) inside its `assertions` field. They are extracted into
`gitea.config.assertions` and evaluated before the guard, otherwise providing an own config Secret
would silently disable chart-wide validation.
- secret_inlineConfig.yaml populates `.Values.gitea.config` as a side effect of
`gitea.inline_configuration`. Without evaluating it, even NOTES.txt fails on
`.Values.gitea.config.cache`. The include therefore runs independently of the guard as well.
`signing.existingSecret` keeps working; `secrets.gpg.existingSecret` takes precedence over it. The
error message raised for an enabled but unconfigured signing setup now lists all three options.
Test suites rendering the Deployment have to declare the Secret templates it checksums, hence the
added `templates:` entries. unittests/helm/deployment/extraInitContainers.yaml set `signing.enabled`
without a key or an existing Secret - a combination that fails a real `helm install` and only went
unnoticed because the Deployment never rendered secret_gpg.yaml before.
Co-authored-by: Copilot <copilot@github.com>
The names of the Secrets rendered by the chart were built inline in each template and, for two of
them, in ad-hoc chart-wide helpers. The same name therefore existed in several places (Deployment
volumes, ServiceMonitor credentials, the Secret templates themselves), which made every rename a
multi-file change and allowed the references to drift apart unnoticed - the Helm unit tests render
one template at a time and cannot detect a mismatching secretName.
All Secret names are now defined once in templates/gitea/_secrets.tpl:
gitea.secret.config.name -> <fullname>-config
gitea.secret.gpg.name -> <fullname>-gpg-key (or signing.existingSecret)
gitea.secret.init.name -> <fullname>-init
gitea.secret.inlineConfig.name -> <fullname>-inline-config
gitea.secret.metrics.name -> <fullname>-metrics
gitea.gpg-key-secret-name and gitea.metrics-secret-name are removed from _helpers.tpl accordingly.
A checksum/inlineConfig pod annotation is added as well. After the inline configuration had been
split out of secret_config.yaml, changes to it were no longer covered by any checksum annotation and
did not trigger a rollout of the Deployment.
Finally the metadata attributes of the Secret templates are sorted alphabetically as required by the
chart conventions.
BREAKING CHANGE: two Secrets are renamed. The config Secret changes from <fullname> to
<fullname>-config and the metrics Secret from <fullname>-metrics-secret to <fullname>-metrics. Helm
replaces both on upgrade; references to them from outside the chart have to be adjusted.
Co-authored-by: Copilot <copilot@github.com>
The files in templates/gitea/ used a mix of naming styles: lowercase concatenations
(poddisruptionbudget.yaml, serviceaccount.yaml, servicemonitor.yaml, pvc.yaml), camelCase
(httpService.yaml, sshService.yaml) and kind-suffixed names (gpg-secret.yaml, metrics-secret.yaml).
It was therefore not obvious from a file name which Kubernetes resource it renders, and the naming
contradicted the camelCase convention the Gateway API templates already follow.
Files are now named after the kind they render, with a lowercase suffix distinguishing several
resources of the same kind:
config.yaml -> secret_config.yaml + secret_inlineConfig.yaml
gpg-secret.yaml -> secret_gpg.yaml
init.yaml -> secret_init.yaml
metrics-secret.yaml -> secret_metrics.yaml
httpService.yaml -> service_http.yaml
sshService.yaml -> service_ssh.yaml
poddisruptionbudget.yaml -> podDisruptionBudget.yaml
pvc.yaml -> persistentVolumeClaim.yaml
serviceaccount.yaml -> serviceAccount.yaml
servicemonitor.yaml -> serviceMonitor.yaml
config.yaml rendered two Secrets from a single file, which forced every unit test to address them via
documentIndex. It is split so that each file renders exactly one resource.
The rendered manifests are unchanged; only file names and the references to them were touched. This
includes the checksum/config annotation in deployment.yaml and all helm unit test suites. The HA guard
assertions had to move from deployment.yaml to secret_config.yaml: Helm sorts templates in reverse
alphabetical order, so secret_config.yaml is now rendered before deployment.yaml and the fail() is
reported for that file directly instead of bubbling up through the include chain of the Deployment.
Users relying on the template paths (e.g. `helm template --show-only` or post-renderers) have to
adjust to the new file names.
Co-authored-by: Copilot <copilot@github.com>
### Description of the change
Add options to values.yaml to make chart easier to install in restricted openshift environments
### Benefits
more people can run this
### Checklist
<!-- [Place an '[X]' (no spaces) in all applicable fields. Please remove unrelated fields.] -->
- [x] Parameters are documented in the `values.yaml` and added to the `README.md` using [readme-generator-for-helm](https://github.com/bitnami-labs/readme-generator-for-helm)
- [ ] Breaking changes are documented in the `README.md`
- [x] Helm templating unittests are added (required when changing anything in `templates` folder)
- [ ] Bash unittests are added (required when changing anything in `scripts` folder)
- [x] All added template resources MUST render a namespace in metadata
---------
Co-authored-by: Lunny Xiao <xiaolunwen@gmail.com>
Reviewed-on: https://gitea.com/gitea/helm-gitea/pulls/1063
Reviewed-by: Lunny Xiao <xiaolunwen@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: techknowlogick <techknowlogick@gitea.com>
Co-committed-by: techknowlogick <techknowlogick@gitea.com>
### Description of the change
Gitea supports providing DB and Redis/ValKey secrets via env variables, current chart requires DB and Redis/ ValKey credentials reading from k8s secret as per below values.yaml snippet. This approach requires secret to be created beforehand.
```
- name: GITEA__database__USER
valueFrom:
secretKeyRef:
name: gitea-ha
key: db_user
- name: GITEA__database__PASSWD
valueFrom:
secretKeyRef:
name: gitea-ha
key: db_password
```
Other approach is to provide the credentials in values.yaml which isnt secure.
A bash variable file can be created by using vault injector like this, which then can be sourced while running `config_environment.sh` in `init-app-ini`
```
GITEA__database__NAME=gitea
GITEA__database__USER=gitea_user
```
Support to read env variables from file
Reference: https://developer.hashicorp.com/vault/docs/deploy/kubernetes/injector/examples#environment-variable-example
### Benefits
Support to read env variables from file created by vault injector for DB and redis/ valkey credentials
Support to set gitea admin user and credentials via env variables from file created by vault injector
### Possible drawbacks
N/A
### âš BREAKING
No breaking changes
### Checklist
- [X] Parameters are documented in the `values.yaml` and added to the `README.md` using [readme-generator-for-helm](https://github.com/bitnami-labs/readme-generator-for-helm)
---------
Co-authored-by: techknowlogick <techknowlogick@gitea.com>
Reviewed-on: https://gitea.com/gitea/helm-gitea/pulls/993
Co-authored-by: deepakdeore2004 <deepakdeore2004@noreply.gitea.com>
Co-committed-by: deepakdeore2004 <deepakdeore2004@noreply.gitea.com>
This PR removes the inclusion of `deployment.labels` in the Deployment's `selector.matchLabels` field.
## Changes
- Removed the conditional block that adds `deployment.labels` to `selector.matchLabels`
- This ensures the selector remains immutable and only contains pod-identifying labels
Reviewed-on: https://gitea.com/gitea/helm-gitea/pulls/1011
Reviewed-by: Markus Pesch <volker.raschek@noreply.gitea.com>
Co-authored-by: Tarun Gaba <tarun.gaba7@gmail.com>
Co-committed-by: Tarun Gaba <tarun.gaba7@gmail.com>
The following patch intoduce the dictionaries pre and postExtraInitContainers.
The dictionaries can be used to specify further initContainers before and after
the gitea initializing process. For example:
```yaml
postExtraInitContainers:
- name: foo
image: docker.io/library/busybox:latest
preExtraInitContainers:
- name: bar
image: docker.io/library/busybox:latest
```
### Description of the change
This fixes an issue when trying to apply a custom probe that is not `tcpSocket`.
### Benefits
Custom probes 🥳
### Applicable issues
- Fixes#694
### Checklist
- [x] Templating unittests are added
Reviewed-on: https://gitea.com/gitea/helm-chart/pulls/717
Co-authored-by: justusbunsi <sk.bunsenbrenner@gmail.com>
Co-committed-by: justusbunsi <sk.bunsenbrenner@gmail.com>
### Description of the change
This enables sane modes for forcing reset, as well as providing more options to users of the chart by giving them the flexibility to set the mode for password creation/modification as part of init whether the user exists or not.
### Benefits
The new default should revert to the behavior before #673 became an issue, while also providing more flexibility for users who want to be able to manage their initial admin user password out-of-band after creating it the first time.
### Possible drawbacks
None that I can think of.
### Applicable issues
- fixes#673
### Additional information
See the discussion in #675 as well
### Checklist
- [X] Parameters are documented in the `values.yaml` and added to the `README.md` using [readme-generator-for-helm](https://github.com/bitnami-labs/readme-generator-for-helm)
Reviewed-on: https://gitea.com/gitea/helm-chart/pulls/677
Reviewed-by: justusbunsi <justusbunsi@noreply.gitea.com>
Co-authored-by: James Harmison <jharmison@gmail.com>
Co-committed-by: James Harmison <jharmison@gmail.com>
<!--
Before you open the request please review the following guidelines and tips to help it be more easily integrated:
- Describe the scope of your change - i.e. what the change does.
- Describe any known limitations with your change.
- Please run any tests or examples that can exercise your modified code.
Thank you for contributing! We will try to review, test and integrate the change as soon as we can.
-->
### Description of the change
<!-- Describe the scope of your change - i.e. what the change does. -->
remove deployment, `serviceName`
### Benefits
<!-- What benefits will be realized by the code change? -->
### Possible drawbacks
<!-- Describe any known limitations with your change -->
### Applicable issues
<!-- Enter any applicable Issues here (You can reference an issue using #). Please remove this section if there is no referenced issue. -->
- fixes#466
### Additional information
<!-- If there's anything else that's important and relevant to your pull request, mention that information here. Please remove this section if it remains empty. -->
### âš BREAKING
<!-- If there's a breaking change, please shortly describe in which way users are affected and how they can mitigate it. If there are no breakings, please remove this section. -->
### Checklist
<!-- [Place an '[X]' (no spaces) in all applicable fields. Please remove unrelated fields.] -->
- [x] Parameters are documented in the `values.yaml` and added to the `README.md` using [readme-generator-for-helm](https://github.com/bitnami-labs/readme-generator-for-helm)
- [x] Breaking changes are documented in the `README.md`
- [x] Templating unittests are added
Reviewed-on: https://gitea.com/gitea/helm-chart/pulls/467
Co-authored-by: yinheli <me@yinheli.com>
Co-committed-by: yinheli <me@yinheli.com>
# Changes
A big shoutout to @luhahn for all his work in #205 which served as the base for this PR.
## Documentation
- [x] After thinking for some time about it, I still prefer the distinct option (as started in #350), i.e. having a standalone "HA" doc under `docs/ha-setup.md` to not have a very long README (which is already quite long).
Most of the information below should go into it with more details and explanations behind all of the individual components.
## Chart deps
~~- Adds `meilisearch` as a chart dependency for a HA-ready issue indexer. Only works with >= Gitea 1.20~~
~~- Adds `redis` as a chart dependency for a HA-ready session and queue store.~~
- Adds `redis-cluster` as a chart dependency for a HA-ready session and queue store (alternative to `redis`). Only works with >= Gitea 1.19.2.
- Removes `memcached` instead of `redis-cluster`
- Add `postgresql-ha` as default DB dep in favor of `postgres`
## Adds smart HA chart logic
The goal is to set smart config values that result in a HA-ready Gitea deployment if `replicaCount` > 1.
- If `replicaCount` > 1,
- `gitea.config.session.PROVIDER` is automatically set to `redis-cluster`
- `gitea.config.indexer.REPO_INDEXER_ENABLED` is automatically set to `false` unless the value is `elasticsearch` or `meilisearch`
- `redis-cluster` is used for `[queue]` and `[cache]` and `[session]`mode or not
Configuration of external instances of `meilisearch` and `minio` are documented in a new markdown doc.
## Deployment vs Statefulset
Given all the discussions about this lately (#428), I think we could use both.
In the end, we do not have the requirement for a sequential pod scale up/scale down as it would happen in statefulsets.
On the other side, we do not have actual stateless pods as we are attaching a RWX to the deployment.
Yet I think because we do not have a leader-election requirement, spawning the pods as a deployment makes "Rolling Updates" easier and also signals users that there is no "leader election" logic and each pod can just be "destroyed" at anytime without causing interruption.
Hence I think we should be able to switch from a statefulset to a deployment, even in the single-replica case.
This change also brought up a templating/linting issue: the definition of `.Values.gitea.config.server.SSH_LISTEN_PORT` in `ssh-svc.yaml` just "luckily" worked so far due to naming-related lint processing. Due to the change from "statefulset" to "deployment", the processing queue changed and caused a failure complaining about `config.server.SSH_LISTEN_PORT` not being defined yet.
The only way I could see to fix this was to "properly" define the value in `values.yaml` instead of conditionally definining it in `helpers.tpl`. Maybe there's a better way?
## Chart PVC Creation
I've adapted the automated PVC creation from another chart to be able to provide the `storageClassName` as I couldn't get dynamic provisioning for EFS going with the current implementation.
In addition the naming and approach within the Gitea chart for PV creation is a bit unusual and aligning it might be beneficial.
A semi-unrelated change which will result in a breaking change for existing users but this PR includes a lot of breaking changes already, so including another one might not make it much worse...
- New `persistence.mount`: whether to mount an existing PVC (via `persistence.existingClaim`
- New `persistence.create`: whether to create a new PVC
## Testing
As this PR does a lot of things, we need proper testing.
The helm chart can be installed from the Git branch via `helm-git` as follows:
```
helm repo add gitea-charts git+https://gitea.com/gitea/helm-chart@/?ref=deployment
helm install gitea --version 0.0.0
```
It is **highly recommended** to test the chart in a dedicated namespace.
I've tested this myself with both `redis` and `redis-cluster` and it seemed to work fine.
I just did some basic operations though and we should do more niche testing before merging.
Examplary `values.yml` for testing (only needs a valid RWX storage class):
<details>
<summary>values.yaml</summary>
```yml
image:
tag: "dev"
PullPolicy: "Always"
rootless: true
replicaCount: 2
persistence:
enabled: true
accessModes:
- ReadWriteMany
storageClass: FIXME
redis-cluster:
enabled: false
global:
redis:
password: gitea
gitea:
config:
indexer:
ISSUE_INDEXER_ENABLED: true
REPO_INDEXER_ENABLED: false
```
</details>
## Preferred setup
The preferred HA setup with respect to performance and stability might currently be as follows:
- Repos: RWX (e.g. EFS or Azurefiles NFS)
- Issue indexer: Meilisearch (HA)
- Session and cache: Redis Cluster (HA)
- Attachments/Avatars: Minio (HA)
This will result in a ~ 10-pod HA setup overall.
All pods have very low resource requests.
fix#98
Co-authored-by: pat-s <pat-s@noreply.gitea.io>
Reviewed-on: https://gitea.com/gitea/helm-chart/pulls/437
Co-authored-by: pat-s <patrick.schratz@gmail.com>
Co-committed-by: pat-s <patrick.schratz@gmail.com>
volker.raschekandCopilot