The names of the Secrets rendered by the chart were built inline in each template and, for two of
them, in ad-hoc chart-wide helpers. The same name therefore existed in several places (Deployment
volumes, ServiceMonitor credentials, the Secret templates themselves), which made every rename a
multi-file change and allowed the references to drift apart unnoticed - the Helm unit tests render
one template at a time and cannot detect a mismatching secretName.
All Secret names are now defined once in templates/gitea/_secrets.tpl:
gitea.secret.config.name -> <fullname>-config
gitea.secret.gpg.name -> <fullname>-gpg-key (or signing.existingSecret)
gitea.secret.init.name -> <fullname>-init
gitea.secret.inlineConfig.name -> <fullname>-inline-config
gitea.secret.metrics.name -> <fullname>-metrics
gitea.gpg-key-secret-name and gitea.metrics-secret-name are removed from _helpers.tpl accordingly.
A checksum/inlineConfig pod annotation is added as well. After the inline configuration had been
split out of secret_config.yaml, changes to it were no longer covered by any checksum annotation and
did not trigger a rollout of the Deployment.
Finally the metadata attributes of the Secret templates are sorted alphabetically as required by the
chart conventions.
BREAKING CHANGE: two Secrets are renamed. The config Secret changes from <fullname> to
<fullname>-config and the metrics Secret from <fullname>-metrics-secret to <fullname>-metrics. Helm
replaces both on upgrade; references to them from outside the chart have to be adjusted.
Co-authored-by: Copilot <copilot@github.com>
The files in templates/gitea/ used a mix of naming styles: lowercase concatenations
(poddisruptionbudget.yaml, serviceaccount.yaml, servicemonitor.yaml, pvc.yaml), camelCase
(httpService.yaml, sshService.yaml) and kind-suffixed names (gpg-secret.yaml, metrics-secret.yaml).
It was therefore not obvious from a file name which Kubernetes resource it renders, and the naming
contradicted the camelCase convention the Gateway API templates already follow.
Files are now named after the kind they render, with a lowercase suffix distinguishing several
resources of the same kind:
config.yaml -> secret_config.yaml + secret_inlineConfig.yaml
gpg-secret.yaml -> secret_gpg.yaml
init.yaml -> secret_init.yaml
metrics-secret.yaml -> secret_metrics.yaml
httpService.yaml -> service_http.yaml
sshService.yaml -> service_ssh.yaml
poddisruptionbudget.yaml -> podDisruptionBudget.yaml
pvc.yaml -> persistentVolumeClaim.yaml
serviceaccount.yaml -> serviceAccount.yaml
servicemonitor.yaml -> serviceMonitor.yaml
config.yaml rendered two Secrets from a single file, which forced every unit test to address them via
documentIndex. It is split so that each file renders exactly one resource.
The rendered manifests are unchanged; only file names and the references to them were touched. This
includes the checksum/config annotation in deployment.yaml and all helm unit test suites. The HA guard
assertions had to move from deployment.yaml to secret_config.yaml: Helm sorts templates in reverse
alphabetical order, so secret_config.yaml is now rendered before deployment.yaml and the fail() is
reported for that file directly instead of bubbling up through the include chain of the Deployment.
Users relying on the template paths (e.g. `helm template --show-only` or post-renderers) have to
adjust to the new file names.
Co-authored-by: Copilot <copilot@github.com>
### Description of the change
Add options to values.yaml to make chart easier to install in restricted openshift environments
### Benefits
more people can run this
### Checklist
<!-- [Place an '[X]' (no spaces) in all applicable fields. Please remove unrelated fields.] -->
- [x] Parameters are documented in the `values.yaml` and added to the `README.md` using [readme-generator-for-helm](https://github.com/bitnami-labs/readme-generator-for-helm)
- [ ] Breaking changes are documented in the `README.md`
- [x] Helm templating unittests are added (required when changing anything in `templates` folder)
- [ ] Bash unittests are added (required when changing anything in `scripts` folder)
- [x] All added template resources MUST render a namespace in metadata
---------
Co-authored-by: Lunny Xiao <xiaolunwen@gmail.com>
Reviewed-on: https://gitea.com/gitea/helm-gitea/pulls/1063
Reviewed-by: Lunny Xiao <xiaolunwen@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: techknowlogick <techknowlogick@gitea.com>
Co-committed-by: techknowlogick <techknowlogick@gitea.com>
### Description of the change
Gitea supports providing DB and Redis/ValKey secrets via env variables, current chart requires DB and Redis/ ValKey credentials reading from k8s secret as per below values.yaml snippet. This approach requires secret to be created beforehand.
```
- name: GITEA__database__USER
valueFrom:
secretKeyRef:
name: gitea-ha
key: db_user
- name: GITEA__database__PASSWD
valueFrom:
secretKeyRef:
name: gitea-ha
key: db_password
```
Other approach is to provide the credentials in values.yaml which isnt secure.
A bash variable file can be created by using vault injector like this, which then can be sourced while running `config_environment.sh` in `init-app-ini`
```
GITEA__database__NAME=gitea
GITEA__database__USER=gitea_user
```
Support to read env variables from file
Reference: https://developer.hashicorp.com/vault/docs/deploy/kubernetes/injector/examples#environment-variable-example
### Benefits
Support to read env variables from file created by vault injector for DB and redis/ valkey credentials
Support to set gitea admin user and credentials via env variables from file created by vault injector
### Possible drawbacks
N/A
### ⚠ BREAKING
No breaking changes
### Checklist
- [X] Parameters are documented in the `values.yaml` and added to the `README.md` using [readme-generator-for-helm](https://github.com/bitnami-labs/readme-generator-for-helm)
---------
Co-authored-by: techknowlogick <techknowlogick@gitea.com>
Reviewed-on: https://gitea.com/gitea/helm-gitea/pulls/993
Co-authored-by: deepakdeore2004 <deepakdeore2004@noreply.gitea.com>
Co-committed-by: deepakdeore2004 <deepakdeore2004@noreply.gitea.com>
This PR removes the inclusion of `deployment.labels` in the Deployment's `selector.matchLabels` field.
## Changes
- Removed the conditional block that adds `deployment.labels` to `selector.matchLabels`
- This ensures the selector remains immutable and only contains pod-identifying labels
Reviewed-on: https://gitea.com/gitea/helm-gitea/pulls/1011
Reviewed-by: Markus Pesch <volker.raschek@noreply.gitea.com>
Co-authored-by: Tarun Gaba <tarun.gaba7@gmail.com>
Co-committed-by: Tarun Gaba <tarun.gaba7@gmail.com>
The following patch intoduce the dictionaries pre and postExtraInitContainers.
The dictionaries can be used to specify further initContainers before and after
the gitea initializing process. For example:
```yaml
postExtraInitContainers:
- name: foo
image: docker.io/library/busybox:latest
preExtraInitContainers:
- name: bar
image: docker.io/library/busybox:latest
```
### Description of the change
This enables sane modes for forcing reset, as well as providing more options to users of the chart by giving them the flexibility to set the mode for password creation/modification as part of init whether the user exists or not.
### Benefits
The new default should revert to the behavior before #673 became an issue, while also providing more flexibility for users who want to be able to manage their initial admin user password out-of-band after creating it the first time.
### Possible drawbacks
None that I can think of.
### Applicable issues
- fixes#673
### Additional information
See the discussion in #675 as well
### Checklist
- [X] Parameters are documented in the `values.yaml` and added to the `README.md` using [readme-generator-for-helm](https://github.com/bitnami-labs/readme-generator-for-helm)
Reviewed-on: https://gitea.com/gitea/helm-chart/pulls/677
Reviewed-by: justusbunsi <justusbunsi@noreply.gitea.com>
Co-authored-by: James Harmison <jharmison@gmail.com>
Co-committed-by: James Harmison <jharmison@gmail.com>
<!--
Before you open the request please review the following guidelines and tips to help it be more easily integrated:
- Describe the scope of your change - i.e. what the change does.
- Describe any known limitations with your change.
- Please run any tests or examples that can exercise your modified code.
Thank you for contributing! We will try to review, test and integrate the change as soon as we can.
-->
### Description of the change
<!-- Describe the scope of your change - i.e. what the change does. -->
remove deployment, `serviceName`
### Benefits
<!-- What benefits will be realized by the code change? -->
### Possible drawbacks
<!-- Describe any known limitations with your change -->
### Applicable issues
<!-- Enter any applicable Issues here (You can reference an issue using #). Please remove this section if there is no referenced issue. -->
- fixes#466
### Additional information
<!-- If there's anything else that's important and relevant to your pull request, mention that information here. Please remove this section if it remains empty. -->
### ⚠ BREAKING
<!-- If there's a breaking change, please shortly describe in which way users are affected and how they can mitigate it. If there are no breakings, please remove this section. -->
### Checklist
<!-- [Place an '[X]' (no spaces) in all applicable fields. Please remove unrelated fields.] -->
- [x] Parameters are documented in the `values.yaml` and added to the `README.md` using [readme-generator-for-helm](https://github.com/bitnami-labs/readme-generator-for-helm)
- [x] Breaking changes are documented in the `README.md`
- [x] Templating unittests are added
Reviewed-on: https://gitea.com/gitea/helm-chart/pulls/467
Co-authored-by: yinheli <me@yinheli.com>
Co-committed-by: yinheli <me@yinheli.com>
# Changes
A big shoutout to @luhahn for all his work in #205 which served as the base for this PR.
## Documentation
- [x] After thinking for some time about it, I still prefer the distinct option (as started in #350), i.e. having a standalone "HA" doc under `docs/ha-setup.md` to not have a very long README (which is already quite long).
Most of the information below should go into it with more details and explanations behind all of the individual components.
## Chart deps
~~- Adds `meilisearch` as a chart dependency for a HA-ready issue indexer. Only works with >= Gitea 1.20~~
~~- Adds `redis` as a chart dependency for a HA-ready session and queue store.~~
- Adds `redis-cluster` as a chart dependency for a HA-ready session and queue store (alternative to `redis`). Only works with >= Gitea 1.19.2.
- Removes `memcached` instead of `redis-cluster`
- Add `postgresql-ha` as default DB dep in favor of `postgres`
## Adds smart HA chart logic
The goal is to set smart config values that result in a HA-ready Gitea deployment if `replicaCount` > 1.
- If `replicaCount` > 1,
- `gitea.config.session.PROVIDER` is automatically set to `redis-cluster`
- `gitea.config.indexer.REPO_INDEXER_ENABLED` is automatically set to `false` unless the value is `elasticsearch` or `meilisearch`
- `redis-cluster` is used for `[queue]` and `[cache]` and `[session]`mode or not
Configuration of external instances of `meilisearch` and `minio` are documented in a new markdown doc.
## Deployment vs Statefulset
Given all the discussions about this lately (#428), I think we could use both.
In the end, we do not have the requirement for a sequential pod scale up/scale down as it would happen in statefulsets.
On the other side, we do not have actual stateless pods as we are attaching a RWX to the deployment.
Yet I think because we do not have a leader-election requirement, spawning the pods as a deployment makes "Rolling Updates" easier and also signals users that there is no "leader election" logic and each pod can just be "destroyed" at anytime without causing interruption.
Hence I think we should be able to switch from a statefulset to a deployment, even in the single-replica case.
This change also brought up a templating/linting issue: the definition of `.Values.gitea.config.server.SSH_LISTEN_PORT` in `ssh-svc.yaml` just "luckily" worked so far due to naming-related lint processing. Due to the change from "statefulset" to "deployment", the processing queue changed and caused a failure complaining about `config.server.SSH_LISTEN_PORT` not being defined yet.
The only way I could see to fix this was to "properly" define the value in `values.yaml` instead of conditionally definining it in `helpers.tpl`. Maybe there's a better way?
## Chart PVC Creation
I've adapted the automated PVC creation from another chart to be able to provide the `storageClassName` as I couldn't get dynamic provisioning for EFS going with the current implementation.
In addition the naming and approach within the Gitea chart for PV creation is a bit unusual and aligning it might be beneficial.
A semi-unrelated change which will result in a breaking change for existing users but this PR includes a lot of breaking changes already, so including another one might not make it much worse...
- New `persistence.mount`: whether to mount an existing PVC (via `persistence.existingClaim`
- New `persistence.create`: whether to create a new PVC
## Testing
As this PR does a lot of things, we need proper testing.
The helm chart can be installed from the Git branch via `helm-git` as follows:
```
helm repo add gitea-charts git+https://gitea.com/gitea/helm-chart@/?ref=deployment
helm install gitea --version 0.0.0
```
It is **highly recommended** to test the chart in a dedicated namespace.
I've tested this myself with both `redis` and `redis-cluster` and it seemed to work fine.
I just did some basic operations though and we should do more niche testing before merging.
Examplary `values.yml` for testing (only needs a valid RWX storage class):
<details>
<summary>values.yaml</summary>
```yml
image:
tag: "dev"
PullPolicy: "Always"
rootless: true
replicaCount: 2
persistence:
enabled: true
accessModes:
- ReadWriteMany
storageClass: FIXME
redis-cluster:
enabled: false
global:
redis:
password: gitea
gitea:
config:
indexer:
ISSUE_INDEXER_ENABLED: true
REPO_INDEXER_ENABLED: false
```
</details>
## Preferred setup
The preferred HA setup with respect to performance and stability might currently be as follows:
- Repos: RWX (e.g. EFS or Azurefiles NFS)
- Issue indexer: Meilisearch (HA)
- Session and cache: Redis Cluster (HA)
- Attachments/Avatars: Minio (HA)
This will result in a ~ 10-pod HA setup overall.
All pods have very low resource requests.
fix#98
Co-authored-by: pat-s <pat-s@noreply.gitea.io>
Reviewed-on: https://gitea.com/gitea/helm-chart/pulls/437
Co-authored-by: pat-s <patrick.schratz@gmail.com>
Co-committed-by: pat-s <patrick.schratz@gmail.com>
volker.raschekandCopilot