4 Commits

Include renames

Author	SHA1	Message	Date
volker.raschekandCopilot	a4c6893874	refactor(templates)!: centralize Secret names in gitea.secret.*.name helpers ... The names of the Secrets rendered by the chart were built inline in each template and, for two of them, in ad-hoc chart-wide helpers. The same name therefore existed in several places (Deployment volumes, ServiceMonitor credentials, the Secret templates themselves), which made every rename a multi-file change and allowed the references to drift apart unnoticed - the Helm unit tests render one template at a time and cannot detect a mismatching secretName. All Secret names are now defined once in templates/gitea/_secrets.tpl: gitea.secret.config.name -> <fullname>-config gitea.secret.gpg.name -> <fullname>-gpg-key (or signing.existingSecret) gitea.secret.init.name -> <fullname>-init gitea.secret.inlineConfig.name -> <fullname>-inline-config gitea.secret.metrics.name -> <fullname>-metrics gitea.gpg-key-secret-name and gitea.metrics-secret-name are removed from _helpers.tpl accordingly. A checksum/inlineConfig pod annotation is added as well. After the inline configuration had been split out of secret_config.yaml, changes to it were no longer covered by any checksum annotation and did not trigger a rollout of the Deployment. Finally the metadata attributes of the Secret templates are sorted alphabetically as required by the chart conventions. BREAKING CHANGE: two Secrets are renamed. The config Secret changes from <fullname> to <fullname>-config and the metrics Secret from <fullname>-metrics-secret to <fullname>-metrics. Helm replaces both on upgrade; references to them from outside the chart have to be adjusted. Co-authored-by: Copilot <copilot@github.com>	2026-09-03 15:32:03 +02:00
volker.raschekandCopilot	4884dc0fe0	refactor(templates): rename template files to match rendered resource kinds ... The files in templates/gitea/ used a mix of naming styles: lowercase concatenations (poddisruptionbudget.yaml, serviceaccount.yaml, servicemonitor.yaml, pvc.yaml), camelCase (httpService.yaml, sshService.yaml) and kind-suffixed names (gpg-secret.yaml, metrics-secret.yaml). It was therefore not obvious from a file name which Kubernetes resource it renders, and the naming contradicted the camelCase convention the Gateway API templates already follow. Files are now named after the kind they render, with a lowercase suffix distinguishing several resources of the same kind: config.yaml -> secret_config.yaml + secret_inlineConfig.yaml gpg-secret.yaml -> secret_gpg.yaml init.yaml -> secret_init.yaml metrics-secret.yaml -> secret_metrics.yaml httpService.yaml -> service_http.yaml sshService.yaml -> service_ssh.yaml poddisruptionbudget.yaml -> podDisruptionBudget.yaml pvc.yaml -> persistentVolumeClaim.yaml serviceaccount.yaml -> serviceAccount.yaml servicemonitor.yaml -> serviceMonitor.yaml config.yaml rendered two Secrets from a single file, which forced every unit test to address them via documentIndex. It is split so that each file renders exactly one resource. The rendered manifests are unchanged; only file names and the references to them were touched. This includes the checksum/config annotation in deployment.yaml and all helm unit test suites. The HA guard assertions had to move from deployment.yaml to secret_config.yaml: Helm sorts templates in reverse alphabetical order, so secret_config.yaml is now rendered before deployment.yaml and the fail() is reported for that file directly instead of bubbling up through the include chain of the Deployment. Users relying on the template paths (e.g. `helm template --show-only` or post-renderers) have to adjust to the new file names. Co-authored-by: Copilot <copilot@github.com>	2026-09-03 14:20:12 +02:00
bachorpandtechknowlogick	2c78da9c3e	docs: set full path of values.yaml key in output to user (#832) ... Currently, the reported path of the values to be changed is not always correct (especially `gitea.persistence` vs. `persistence`). Co-authored-by: techknowlogick <techknowlogick@noreply.gitea.com> Reviewed-on: https://gitea.com/gitea/helm-gitea/pulls/832 Reviewed-by: techknowlogick <techknowlogick@noreply.gitea.com> Co-authored-by: bachorp <bachorp@noreply.gitea.com> Co-committed-by: bachorp <bachorp@noreply.gitea.com>	2025-03-26 17:16:17 +00:00
justusbunsi	4691b63f7a	Move Helm unittests into subfolder (#750) ... Reviewed-on: https://gitea.com/gitea/helm-chart/pulls/750 Co-authored-by: justusbunsi <sk.bunsenbrenner@gmail.com> Co-committed-by: justusbunsi <sk.bunsenbrenner@gmail.com>	2024-12-18 12:04:15 +00:00