### Description of the change
This adds a new values object `serviceAccount`, that allows creating a dedicated ServiceAccount with the Helm Release into the cluster. It supports all common options like labels, annotations, name override (or referring to an externally created ServiceAccount), auto-mount token, image pull secrets.
It supersedes the stale PR #357.
### Benefits
Users can deploy Gitea with more fine-tuned security settings.
### Applicable issues
- related to #448
### Additional information
I've bumped the helm-unittest plugin in the CI build, to be able to use the `exists` and `notExists` feature in the new tests.
### Checklist
- [x] Parameters are documented in the `values.yaml` and added to the `README.md` using [readme-generator-for-helm](https://github.com/bitnami-labs/readme-generator-for-helm)
Reviewed-on: https://gitea.com/gitea/helm-chart/pulls/451
Reviewed-by: pat-s <pat-s@noreply.gitea.com>
Co-authored-by: justusbunsi <sk.bunsenbrenner@gmail.com>
Co-committed-by: justusbunsi <sk.bunsenbrenner@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Cyril Jouve <jv.cyril@gmail.com>
<!--
Before you open the request please review the following guidelines and tips to help it be more easily integrated:
- Describe the scope of your change - i.e. what the change does.
- Describe any known limitations with your change.
- Please run any tests or examples that can exercise your modified code.
Thank you for contributing! We will try to review, test and integrate the change as soon as we can.
-->
### Description of the change
<!-- Describe the scope of your change - i.e. what the change does. -->
add a new value `extraDeploy` to add arbitrary resources
inspired by bitnami charts ([example](https://github.com/bitnami/charts/blob/main/bitnami/postgresql/values.yaml#L58)
### Benefits
<!-- What benefits will be realized by the code change? -->
with the change, I can deploy additional resources and keep them consistent with the chart (reuse macro, same labels, etc)., same workflow (helm upgrade), etc
### Possible drawbacks
<!-- Describe any known limitations with your change -->
### Additional information
<!-- If there's anything else that's important and relevant to your pull request, mention that information here. Please remove this section if it remains empty. -->
### Checklist
<!-- [Place an '[X]' (no spaces) in all applicable fields. Please remove unrelated fields.] -->
- [x] Parameters are documented in the `values.yaml` and added to the `README.md` using [readme-generator-for-helm](https://github.com/bitnami-labs/readme-generator-for-helm)
Co-authored-by: pat-s <pat-s@noreply.gitea.io>
Reviewed-on: https://gitea.com/gitea/helm-chart/pulls/441
Reviewed-by: pat-s <pat-s@noreply.gitea.io>
Reviewed-by: luhahn <luhahn@noreply.gitea.io>
Reviewed-by: justusbunsi <justusbunsi@noreply.gitea.io>
Co-authored-by: Cyril Jouve <jv.cyril@gmail.com>
Co-committed-by: Cyril Jouve <jv.cyril@gmail.com>
### Description of the change
Fix a wrong reference to `signing.existingKey`, `signing.existingSecret` was what was meant and what is used in the chart.
### Benefits
Less confusion when trying to use the Helm chart.
### Possible drawbacks
Evangelists of `existingKey` storming the barricades even though `existingKey` is long dead.
### Applicable issues
None, nobody noticed enough to care, apparently.
Co-authored-by: Tobias Wolter <towo@towo.eu>
Reviewed-on: https://gitea.com/gitea/helm-chart/pulls/415
Reviewed-by: pat-s <pat-s@noreply.gitea.io>
Reviewed-by: justusbunsi <justusbunsi@noreply.gitea.io>
Co-authored-by: towo <towo@noreply.gitea.io>
Co-committed-by: towo <towo@noreply.gitea.io>
### Description of the change
This PR adds support for gpg key setup. It allows to pass the gpg private key content inline inside `values.yaml` or refer to an existing secret containing the key content data.
### Benefits
Administrators don't need to manually setup the gpg environment from inside a running container. It also eliminates the breaking change of Gitea 1.17 regarding `[git].HOME` as the `GNUPGHOME` environment variable is used consistently to relocate the `.gnupg` directory to its former location.
### Applicable issues
- fixes#107
### Additional information
This PR add the first unit tests to this Helm Chart, ensuring templating integrity for signing related configuration.
### Checklist
- [x] Parameters are documented in the `values.yaml` and added to the `README.md` using [readme-generator-for-helm](https://github.com/bitnami-labs/readme-generator-for-helm)
Co-authored-by: justusbunsi <sk.bunsenbrenner@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: pat-s <pat-s@noreply.gitea.io>
Reviewed-on: https://gitea.com/gitea/helm-chart/pulls/343
Reviewed-by: luhahn <luhahn@noreply.gitea.io>
Reviewed-by: techknowlogick <techknowlogick@gitea.io>
Co-authored-by: justusbunsi <justusbunsi@noreply.gitea.io>
Co-committed-by: justusbunsi <justusbunsi@noreply.gitea.io>
### Description of the change
Checking the existence of the config directory should be done with the directory path itself. Not its parent directory.
This simple fix addresses that by using the config directory for its existence check.
### Benefits
Prior to #337 there was no other way to install this helm chart using the `extraVolumeMounts` setting with these values:
```yaml
replicaCount: %d
extraVolumes:
- name: config-volume
configMap:
name: %s
extraVolumeMounts:
- name: config-volume
mountPath: /data/gitea/templates/custom
```
Without this fix, the Gitea pod would never initialize, and would crashloop with the same error in #296.
### Additional information
Mounting a configMap to `/data/gitea/templates/custom` causes the `/data/gitea` folder to exist even though the `/data/gitea/conf` had not been initialized yet. The initialization script saw that the `/data/gitea` dir existed and exited early without initializing `/data/gitea/conf`.
Co-authored-by: cboin1996 <christianboin@hotmail.com>
Reviewed-on: https://gitea.com/gitea/helm-chart/pulls/310
Reviewed-by: justusbunsi <justusbunsi@noreply.gitea.io>
Reviewed-by: pat-s <pat-s@noreply.gitea.io>
Co-authored-by: cboin1996 <cboin1996@noreply.gitea.io>
Co-committed-by: cboin1996 <cboin1996@noreply.gitea.io>
## Context
PR #259 introduced support for running Gitea as a uid different than 1000 (git) or 0 (root).
## Problem
In init_directory_structure.sh, there is a "chown 1000:1000" on /tmp/gitea.
This chown only works when running as root or when the target directory is already owned by uid 1000.
As a result, the init container "init-directories" fails on startup when running Gitea with a uid different from 0 or 1000.
Initially, I worked around it by implementing an "initPreScript". But it would make user's life easier if we can make it work out-of-the-box.
## Resolution
I'm taking model on the chown a few lines above that depends on the value of image.rootless. Since the chown only works on default (root) image and is useless on rootless image, there is no need to run it on rootless image.
Co-authored-by: Nicolas MASSE <nicolas.masse@itix.fr>
Reviewed-on: https://gitea.com/gitea/helm-chart/pulls/266
Reviewed-by: luhahn <luhahn@noreply.gitea.io>
Reviewed-by: justusbunsi <justusbunsi@noreply.gitea.io>
Co-authored-by: nmasse-itix <nmasse-itix@noreply.gitea.io>
Co-committed-by: nmasse-itix <nmasse-itix@noreply.gitea.io>
With release 5.0.0 there are so many deprecations and breaking changes
that it is probably a good way to assist the users with values migration
before breaking their environments.
This adds another template file that doesn't render anything but ensures
the removal of dropped or deprecated settings from customized values
files.
For when it is necessary, this check can be disabled via new setting
`checkDeprecation`.
Reviewed-on: https://gitea.com/gitea/helm-chart/pulls/269
Reviewed-by: luhahn <luhahn@noreply.gitea.io>
Reviewed-by: wxiaoguang <wxiaoguang@noreply.gitea.io>
Co-authored-by: justusbunsi <justusbunsi@noreply.gitea.io>
Co-committed-by: justusbunsi <justusbunsi@noreply.gitea.io>
With the result of PR #239 it is much easier to provide additional values to the _app.ini_ configuration from different sources.
These changes adds an _additionalConfigSources_ field where the users can define such sources. This enables the users to choose
on their own whether to store values in _values.yaml_ or load them from Kuberetes Secrets or ConfigMaps.
- Fixes#243
- Fixes#174
- Fixes#260
Reviewed-on: https://gitea.com/gitea/helm-chart/pulls/240
Reviewed-by: luhahn <luhahn@noreply.gitea.io>
Reviewed-by: wxiaoguang <wxiaoguang@noreply.gitea.io>
Co-authored-by: justusbunsi <justusbunsi@noreply.gitea.io>
Co-committed-by: justusbunsi <justusbunsi@noreply.gitea.io>
Hello !
I'm using the new Helm chart (5.x) and I really like the new configuration mechanism. 👍
I would like to contribute the following enhancement.
## The problem I want to solve
I'm trying to deploy Gitea in a Kubernetes shared platform and I need to make sure each instance is running as a different user so that in case of container escape, the risk of data leak is minimized.
Additionally, on my platform (OpenShift), arbitrary users (such as uid 1000 for Gitea) are not allowed.
The current helm chart does not allow me to achieve this because:
- the container security context is configurable only for the main container. The security context of init containers cannot be specified.
- a fixed uid is hard coded
- a fixed fs group is hard coded
Also, the securityContext of a pod and the securityContext of a container do not accept the same options.
- https://kubernetes.io/docs/reference/generated/kubernetes-api/v1.19/#podsecuritycontext-v1-core
- https://kubernetes.io/docs/reference/generated/kubernetes-api/v1.19/#securitycontext-v1-core
## How I'm solving the problem
I split the `securityContext` (values.yaml) in two: `containerSecurityContext` and `podSecurityContext`. The containerSecurityContext applies to all containers (init and main) in order to be consistent with file permissions.
The behavior for existing deployments is unchanged:
- fsGroup 1000 is the default value for the podSecurityContext variable
- the "configure-gitea" init container uses the uid 1000 unless otherwise stated in the containerSecurityContext
- the main container is using the existing securityContext variable when defined in order not to break existing deployments and uses the new containerSecurityContext variable if not.
This approach is well tested: it is used consistently on bitnami's Helm charts.
## How I tested
I tested both root and rootless variants on a Kubernetes 1.22, as well as rootless variant on OpenShift 4.7.
**rootless variant on Kubernetes**:
```yaml
podSecurityContext:
fsGroup: 10001
containerSecurityContext:
allowPrivilegeEscalation: false
capabilities:
drop:
- ALL
add:
- SYS_CHROOT
privileged: false
runAsGroup: 10001
runAsNonRoot: true
runAsUser: 10001
extraVolumes:
- name: var-lib-gitea
emptyDir: {}
extraVolumeMounts:
- name: var-lib-gitea
readOnly: false
mountPath: "/var/lib/gitea"
```
**rootless variant on OpenShift**:
```yaml
podSecurityContext:
fsGroup: null
containerSecurityContext:
allowPrivilegeEscalation: false
privileged: false
runAsNonRoot: true
runAsUser: 1000790000
extraVolumes:
- name: var-lib-gitea
emptyDir: {}
extraVolumeMounts:
- name: var-lib-gitea
readOnly: false
mountPath: "/var/lib/gitea"
```
Let me know if something is unclear.
Co-authored-by: Nicolas MASSE <nicolas.masse@itix.fr>
Reviewed-on: https://gitea.com/gitea/helm-chart/pulls/259
Reviewed-by: luhahn <luhahn@noreply.gitea.io>
Reviewed-by: justusbunsi <justusbunsi@noreply.gitea.io>
Co-authored-by: nmasse-itix <nmasse-itix@noreply.gitea.io>
Co-committed-by: nmasse-itix <nmasse-itix@noreply.gitea.io>
Currently there are two different styles for defining both ldap and oauth configuration in _values.yaml_ file: `camelCase` and `kebab-case`.
Supporting both styles created multiple regressions in the past.
⚠️ BREAKING ⚠️
---------------
These changes completely remove any support for `kebab-case` notation in _values.yaml_ in favor of `camelCase`. Configuration keys must use `camelCase`.
Only exception are Kubernetes resource keys for annotations or labels.
Fixes: #188
Reviewed-on: https://gitea.com/gitea/helm-chart/pulls/196
Reviewed-by: luhahn <luhahn@noreply.gitea.io>
Reviewed-by: Lunny Xiao <xiaolunwen@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: justusbunsi <justusbunsi@noreply.gitea.io>
Co-committed-by: justusbunsi <justusbunsi@noreply.gitea.io>
These changes rewrite the init script to be error aware, informative and have a bit more security awareness.
During rewrite several hidden bugs could be identified and fixed, such as:
- LDAP configuration options interpreted by the shell before passed to command
- Finding multiple ldap ids instead of one during lookup when their names are almost identical
e.g. `_my-ldap-auth` and `my-ldap-auth`
- Properly filter auth sources by their types to prevent unintended type converting attempts that fail
In addition to that the script is a bit cleaner. Some commands do not exist anymore and would cause false-positive errors during script execution.
Helps for: #149
Reviewed-on: https://gitea.com/gitea/helm-chart/pulls/178
Reviewed-by: luhahn <luhahn@noreply.gitea.io>
Reviewed-by: techknowlogick <techknowlogick@gitea.io>
Co-authored-by: justusbunsi <justusbunsi@noreply.gitea.io>
Co-committed-by: justusbunsi <justusbunsi@noreply.gitea.io>
